Cupric vs CP Due dilligence, page-8

I still don't have an answer to my initial question on why the Cupric deal did not breach the lenders terms but CPs did?

If DML were notified on the 10th that it was in breach and the lenders did not want to retract their statement then why didn't DML pull out of the MOU with CP and start looking at other options?

Didn't they announce after the deal with Cupric fell over that several companies had come forward?

Still doesn't add up!