So your "evidence" of long-term damage is not clinically-proven data, but unreviewed, statistically insignificant media articles, replete with the qualifying clauses of "could" and "may"...
And in one report, applicable to 30% of patients who were in intensive care (and, at that, maybe... we don't know for sure):
And in the other case, certain elderly patients who had Covid-pneumonioa, and other illnesses such as cancer and diabetes or other lung conditions caused by smoking...
(Well, no sheet Sherlock)
Not exactly universally applicable across the entire population though, is it... these "may", "could", "might" examples you provide as - presumably - your best evidence.
.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Curfew in Victoria...
Curfew in Victoria..., page-107
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 114 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)