So your "evidence" of long-term damage is not clinically-proven...

So your "evidence" of long-term damage is not clinically-proven data, but unreviewed, statistically insignificant media articles, replete with the qualifying clauses of "could" and "may"...

And in one report, applicable to 30% of patients who were in intensive care (and, at that, maybe... we don't know for sure):




And in the other case, certain elderly patients who had Covid-pneumonioa, and other illnesses such as cancer and diabetes or other lung conditions caused by smoking...



(Well, no sheet Sherlock)

Not exactly universally applicable across the entire population though, is it... these "may", "could", "might" examples you provide as - presumably - your best evidence.

.