CY5 General Discussion, page-344

Oh hi again. Ahh was only making general observations.
Yes don’t forget this is only a plan view of stragraphic units,so 2D.
Which is not how they really exist. They exist in 3D . So from mostly underneath as they rise up.
So they’re really evolve at depth after seperating from other granite plutons.
So after that they’re all the same block, as they rise higher there’s reduction in pressure+ heat ,starts the crystallisation and ejection of the magmatic water ( called melt- melt immiscibility).
So these fluids have very low viscosity,travel for many km ( hidden?) until they cool at favourable places.eg brittle stock. And on course on the way fractionation of this fluid.
So can only go by what we can see on these SIGEOM sheets, but at least in the right neighbourhood with a package of the VCS.
The VCS has been classed into 3 units, 1 and 2 are granitic. The 3rd is the pegmatite. Bit confusing but that’s how they’ve done it. Adina the same.
Re emplacement, there’s always ideas. For eg here’s Corvette project. Blue arrow is Neoarchean dyke , same age as as VCS. Above it VC 2. It heads straight into inflection point ( white oval) and pegmatites.
Then to the west black arrow is VCS in geology and along geology lines and probably foliation.
So which one is best pathway bet for the spodumene pegs?Both?

Ahh re pathway minerals,yes that’d help sniff things out in a regional sense if there was enough SIGEOM data but not sure there is? LCT pegs still a bit new in Quebec ,and bit rough out there I hear.