- It dramatically improves workflow as the images can be...

- It dramatically improves workflow as the images can be captured at an earlier stage of the doctor's workflow, and the patient doesn't have to go to the nuclear department.
Ok, but… that is not an improvement in workflow, it’s a disruption to the existing workflows.
No, the existing workflow ends earlier and the final result - the image - is achieved quicker and earlier.

- Everything can be done at the CT stage.- Radiologists read the images the same as a SPECT image, so there aren't challenges around learning a new way.
Ok, but…I’m not sure that the chronically overburdened radiologists and CT Dept with a high load of ED patients being shoved in sideways will appreciate the new patient load being “funneled” to them and away from the nuclear imaging dept.
Radiolgists recieve an image from nuclear scans. This will be the same, but it will be with them quicker. Their workload will remain the same.

- It dramatically increases accessibility as it can be performed on any CT machine so patients will no longer be funneled to their nearest nuclear medicine facility.
Ok, but…they are not really being “funneled” there so much…it’s just a system, that’s in place…that works.…
4DX is hoping to overhaul these systems…and while they may have trials to gather data, it’s not the same when it comes to telling everyone we now want to change (overhaul) the established systems and workflows.
As I'm sure you know, not all hospitals have nuclear departments, so patients who need a nuclear scan are sent there. Or within a hospital, nuclear scans can't be done on CT machines so paitents who need one are sent to the nuclear department. 4DX's solutions will mean they won't need to go there, as an comparable image can be achieved on the CT machine.