Look within. I owe you no debt.Agreed. Only slight caveat you...

Look within. I owe you no debt.

Agreed. Only slight caveat you kind of sign on to the terms of use - you kind of breached them years ago and are pretty quick and easy with the attacks on character still - though it seems to me you are better. But YES - you own me no debt.

It's a public forum on shares - no more, no less.

Also pretty fair - but everything is connected to everything

You're a moral crusader and I am not.

Not really (me).

You - I would ask - do you have a moral code (Y/N)
Does it extend to do anything for others to uphold their rights (perhaps even if only to have them uphold yours) (Y/N)


I don't have an expectation on you and I don't accept yours on me. Deal with it.

I can. But see I have some obligations to myself - no one really should waste their time on relationships and pursuits that are opportunity costs for better relationships and pursuits.

>>>>Yet, you feel you have enough of an understanding to damn their souls to hell.

>>>>>No. And that's not what I said.

>>>>Now I think its not whether the FDA under Marks and Verdun have saved face for me - its about whether or not weak politic types have sold out their souls and their duty if I could put it that way.

You are heavily inferring it. Own it, rather than try and weasel out of it.

What I said is on the record - I own (accept responsibility for) the record - but you can't create with inferences things I don't actually imply.

>>> The language is strong enough to have a direct meaning. Don't hide behind atheism if a continue to weed you out (which I have). You could of said they may have made an error - but you didn't.

>>>a self proclaimed position of ignorance.

>>>I proclaimed no position of ignorance.

>>>>>Please understand I am not asserting that I know for sure that Marks and Verdun did the wrong thing

>>> You are admitting to not knowing that which you are discussing.

No I am saying I don't know for certain that Marks and Verdun sold out, I am open to them actually having made the right decision on further information, but that on the available information as I see it, it looks like they might have sold out rather than that they made the right decision which I think should have been to have required another trial in adults or something beyond what could be obtained from the one trial they refer to as being evidence (in the announcement of Verduns and Mark's for the FDA on the MSB part of this HC forum - which I referred to there).


??? You are indeed ignorant to the subject matter that has Marks and Verdun potentially spending eternity in damnation (if they believe hell exists).

What subject matter are you claiming I am ignorant of ? Stuff they have seen and you and I have not or stuff you have seen as well?

Forget souls - think integrity - think of children and young adults that have not done something in life that they regret yet, they haven't become cynical and traded down to be lesser versions of their own potential yet and that still want to be good people and still have some aspirations to be good people and to do good for others - then think - some take bribes and do stuff they regret - thats what I mean by selling out.

>>> Oh, you have proclaimed - no doubt.

Yes what I have written I have written.

Seriously though - I'm back to I have obligations to me - to not waste my time - this is getting there. To get a reply your next post will need to be worth it as I judge it -obviously same applies from your side.