Daily Price Movement / General Discussion, page-23461

I'm using hindsight to justify what I believe would have happened.

The $14.50 spike was an inflated bubble (price would likely have been $11-$12 without AFR articles) based on speciation. That works both ways IMO.

So the Apple news was the same thing but in reverse. Meaning, I think it would have worn off.

At the very least, I didn't see a reason to sell Zip to buy Sezzle. I couldn't understand that because why would Sezzle have a way better report than Zip? It didn't make sense.

Plus Sezzle hadn't experienced any of the downwards movement Zip had at that time. So if their report didn't reach expectations, I believed it was obvious it would tank hard.

I said all of that to you though. I also mentioned my Zip and Sezzle share price sync theory. I definitely don't 100% believe it, but like I said, I wouldn't bet against it at this point.