Daily Price Movement / General Discussion, page-6609

With all due respect , calling BS on your post: In the first instance Larry Dimond is a “ public officer” open to the scrutiny of all stake holders, and public opinion at any given time.

Opinion come both as positive and negative, call them criticism, critique, commentary, review or praise and so on…If you go to a public forum, such as tv , magazine, radio. Webcast, and so and preach you hate banks then you are up for scrutiny. for eg:

1 Larry Dimond quote among many about the dislike of banks

“Australians have been taken advantage of when it comes to credit products for far too long. We’re talking about cheeky fine print, hidden costs and unfair credit business models, all of which were created outside the interests of customers.”

Then what does Lary and the board do , allow all the banks to buy up stock and short ........... disgraceful hypocritical behaviour

Directors are supposed to possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interest of the shareholders/stakeholders. How does allowing the major share holders to borrow out there shares to short represent the interest the long term wellbeing of the company deflating the price on average an relentlessly at 5% per day, suppressing the well of good news story's to suit the shorter narrative? Howe does allowing USB who owns 10,546,777 shares to put out a” down grade sell” sentiment represent integrity ?

So my comments, be it criticism, critique, review or even praise, what ever you want to call it …still stand Larry Dimond and the board for allowing such behaviour are opportunistic pr*ks who have sold the retail investor down the river.

Z1P is unethical and my strong recommendation’s is uninstall the app and don’t let their merchants into your business … period.

another red day rant.