But they still have to contend with this Bull sh#t - just wish NOAH would build another ark and sail off into the sunset! -
NOAH: Response from mining company is unsatisfactory
Greenland Minerals Ltd. points out that they have assessed the earthquake risk at Kuannersuit. But where is the report, the environmental organization NOAH, who has been granted access to all background documents.
Niels Henrik Hooge of NOAH does not understand John Mair from Greenland Minerals Ltd.
Archive photo
AddThis Sharing Buttons Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to EmailShare to print
Editors
Sunday, 21. July 2019-08:31
In last week's newspaper, the director of the mining company Greenland Minerals Ltd., John Mair, expressed his annoyed that the Environmental Protection Agency for raw materials had provided the preliminary draft of an EIA to the environmental organization NOAH.
Niels Henrik Hooge from NOAH does not understand that annoyance.
It writes the newspaper Sermitsiaq.
"John Mair seems to assume that the rules of public law do not apply to GML. The Environmental Protection Agency for the raw materials sector does not, of course, have access to documents because they feel like it, but because they are obliged to do so, all the time that they, as a public authority, are bound by the principle of legality, that is to say, cannot take decisions which are not Legislation. Ordinary citizens do not have access is also not correct. You can search for access. It is also worth noting that the Aarhus Convention, which provides additional access to environmental information, does not apply in Greenland. This means that if, for example, the Kuannersuit project was in Denmark, where the Aarhus convention is binding by virtue of EU law, GML would not benefit from all the exceptions in the publicity law that apply in Greenland, says Niels Henrik Hooge of NOAH.
.
GGG Price at posting:
14.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
