"Anyway my posts werent specifically on LUM as I pionted out bar the one directed to stolwyk who was looking for a bite".
Who says I was looking for a bite? When you explained TA in general in your first post, I didn't reply.
But when you in the *next* post you said this: "When did I start bagging lum...When the stock went into a downtrend...basically I was putting people off buying the stock as it was falling...I bet I saved people a lot more money than stolwyk or gaga did...they have been promoting the stock all the way down".
So *you* were looking for a bite, not me. And I took you up on this.
Another one of those twisty statements from you.
Now you say that you did put this matter re LUM's conduct to me and I didn't reply.
Not true, I did by pointing out that we have dealt with this a couple of times.
In any case, why should I accord you a reply if others have discussed it previously.
It is unfortunate that you always manage to mention my name but I suppose that is the way you are. I take it that you are none too happy?
LUM Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held