Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

"accuracy was a bit more robust". ............ WHAT?an appalling...

First 6 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

58,198 Posts.

664

09/11/21

00:54

Post #: 57411755
Share

Originally posted by zipperlip: ↑

If only the data collection’s accuracy was a bit more robust I would say historical data was proof enough.

I think you are a bit quick to call the historical data proof, that’s my right as an individual.
You can disagree and I’m very happy for you to do so but I will point out that I still have time on my side and you are stuck with what knowledge we have today.

None of us really know and crap things happen, Covid isn’t going away, so far it has been bad but not catastrophic and there are plenty of countries that have bugger all jabs/lockdowns and life goes on.

It’s just a part of life, after all.

Expand

"accuracy was a bit more robust". ............ WHAT?

an appalling effort..... you may choose to resubmit or receive an FF.
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

AW1

American West inks offtake deal – but former hype long forgotten

Thursday's HotCopper trends: 29Metals quarterly, Kairos drilling | July 17

FFM

FireFly: Very high-grade infill drill results prove Green Bay is 'exceptional asset'

Mandalay Resources unveils promising new high-grade discovery at Björkdal Mine

First 6 Last

SPONSORED BY