Flat top, I'm sure even you can work out that there are a great...

Flat top, I'm sure even you can work out that there are a great many other ruthless tyrants about and that they are of a far greater priority than Saddam. Why suddenly Saddam (Rumsfeld's best mate not long ago) and only after the US found no Bin Laden to choke, nor any WMD? You can interpret events as you like. I say there are many ways of putting an to a tyrant. One of them is not to give birth or nurture one in the first place. If you haven't been around long enough as you say then let me repeat to you my stance on this: War no good; Saddam no good; Bush no good; Blair no good; Sharron, Netenyahu and a whole lot of others around him (a mirror site of the Pentagon) are no good. Nth Korea no good; Musharaf (another of the Pentagon's toy boys) no good. Now I can't sit here and explain why I think all this -for obvious reasons regarding time and place constraints but you can work it out. Don't tell me you're as dumb as Leapin' Headlong (into idiocy)!