Got to be good for Miners.....The West Australian government...

  1. 2,204 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 208

    Got to be good for Miners.....


    The West Australian government will scrap its controversial Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Laws within days, the ABC understands.

    Key points:

    • The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act had been a source of confusion and controversy
    • They required many landholders to undertake detailed assessments before starting projects
    • The ABC understands the laws are set to be scrapped in days

    Premier Roger Cook and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Tony Buti will make an announcement early next week.

    It follows months of harsh criticism of the laws and the government in the lead up to their implementation on July 1 and in the weeks following.

    The criticism has been lead by WA's opposition parties — the Nationals and Liberals — along with farmers groups including WAFarmers and the Pastoralists and Graziers Association.

    A man in a suit and tie speaks at a press conference.
    Roger Cook will make an announcement within coming days, the ABC understands.(ABC News: James Carmody)

    It's understood the state will revert to operating under the 1972 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage legislation.

    The new legislation came into force to 'modernise' the existing process, which saw major problems exposed in the wake of the destruction of Juukan Gorge.

    The laws require some WA landowners to check for the presence of cultural heritage before conducting any activities that may compromise such sites.

    Where a risk exists, landowners may need to seek permits or prepare management plans depending on the type of activity and the extent to which the land will be cleared or disturbed.

    The government also made numerous exemptions for lower-level works that did not previously exist.

    Tone shifts over laws

    At the time, the legislation was moved through parliament quickly and the Opposition voted in favour, but say that was something they now have come to regret.

    Key criticism of the act were that it was too confusing and unclear, that it would be too time consuming and too expensive for landowners to meet the requirements of it, and that it would be open to abuse.

    A man in a suit looks at the camera with a flag in the background.
    WA Aboriginal Affairs Minister Tony Buti had denied there was uncertainty around the new cultural heritage laws. (ABC News: James Carmody)

    For weeks the government has defended the act, but the tone of ministers has shifted more recently.

    But members of the state and federal governments as recently as this week suggested criticism of the act by the Liberal Party amounted to a scare campaign aimed at fostering divisions ahead of the referendum on the Voice.

    WA Liberal leader Libby Mettam described the government's potential backflip as a "great win for landowners".

    "We understand the Labor government will backflip on the Aboriginal cultural heritage act laws that they introduced earlier in the year," Ms Mettam said.

    A blonde woman speaks at a press conference.
    Libby Mettam described introduction of the laws as "shambolic".(ABC News: Briana Shepherd)

    "We've always committed to scrapping the cultural heritage act and going back to the drawing board.

    "They were quite clearly an overreach on private property rights.

    "They went way too far.

    "And it was extraordinary how the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs was even unable to answer really basic questions about how this act would actually work.

    "It has been shambolic from the start."

    Tony Seabrook is the president of the Pastoralists and Graziers Association WA, and said he wanted to see the act officially withdrawn.

    "It's fantastic news. We can't ask for much more than what seems to have been what's announced," he said.

    People in suits speak to the media at a press conference
    Tony Seabrook says the "message has finally gotten through".(ABC News: James Carmody)

    "There will be a lot of people all around regional Australia and a lot of landholders that will be sleeping a lot easier tonight than they were last night.

    "I think the message has finally gotten through. This was a very poor piece of legislation and the community just didn't want it."

    Mr Seabrook said "a very serious shot had been fired across the boughs" of people considering similar legislation in the eastern states.

    Executive director of the Property Council WA Sandra Brewer said the group had held dozens of meetings this week with concerned members and industry groups.

    “For some time, the property industry has had serious concerns about the operation of the act and had come to a position that the act was unworkable for various reasons,” she said.

    “While the industry supports all of the intentions of the act to protect Aboriginal cultural heritage, it was found to have onerous requirements and wouldn’t have been successful in its current form.”

    'Saddened and heartbroken'

    South West Land and Sea Council board member Michelle Nelson-Cox said she was very upset by the news.

    Michelle Nelson-Cox
    Michelle Nelson-Cox is part of the organisation that administers the South West Native Title Settlement.(ABC News: Robert Koenig-Luck)

    "I feel very saddened and heartbroken," she said.

    "It was going to allow better negotiations and genuine community partnership agreements, better accountability and transparency and most importantly protection of Aboriginal heritage

    "It just seems a shame after all of the work that's been put into this bill that the outcome is that it's not going to get over."

    Want more local WA news?

    Select "Western Australia Top Stories" from either the ABC News homepage or the settings menu in the app.

    Here's some of the latest local reads from WA

    Posted 9h ago9 hours ago, updated 9h ago
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.