good deal to be learned about liquidity

  1. 56,495 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 255
    Sydney - Tuesday - April 15: (RWE Aust Business News) -
    Australians have been observing the major financial events of the past
    year mainly from the sidelines, Reserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens said
    today.
    In the annual Sir Leslie Melville lecture delivered to the
    Australian National University in Canberra Mr Stevens said a good deal
    had been learned about the nature of liquidity, markets and the role of
    central banks over the past year.
    "One key lesson is the importance of liquidity in markets and to
    institutions, something that perhaps had not been emphasised as much as
    it should have been in regulation, where the emphasis has been very much
    on capital," he said.
    "We have further learned that, under conditions of great
    uncertainty, liquidity pressures can erupt in markets that had seldom
    been affected in the past. Central banks have responded quickly and
    flexibly to such events, but it has proven difficult to contain the
    pressures fully. Some quite important questions remain for the longer
    run, which central banks will be considering.
    "A second lesson is the difficulty in resolving a problem with an
    individual institution under strained overall conditions. Bagehot's
    formula provides only the most general of guidance: making it operational
    requires considerable judgement. If and when such an event comes, it
    tends to have its own unique elements and a particular set of
    circumstances as backdrop. Speed and flexibility in response are
    essential. So is consistent and early communication, since disclosure of
    support, if not managed very carefully, could turn out to make the
    situation worse rather than better.
    "A third lesson is that a loan of last resort is, in the end,
    probably simply bridging finance while a takeover or major re-structure
    of the recipient institution is organised. The recipient would very
    likely see a change in its business model, management, board and
    ownership structure. It could well require a pretty clear statement of
    temporary government support. All of this would need to be organised very
    quickly.
    "To be in a position to help, central banks have to keep an ear
    closely tuned to market developments - a sceptical one in the years of
    good times, and a sensitive one in periods of duress. A very good working
    relationship with the prudential supervisor, where that is not the
    central bank, is also essential."
    Mr Stevens said the concept of a lender of last resort, where the
    central bank lends to one specific entity when no-one else will, has been
    developed to deal with a panic that could easily overwhelm a perfectly
    sound institution that, though prudently managed, cannot possibly hold
    enough liquid assets to withstand the pressure unaided.
    "The notion has quite a history. The earliest use of the term
    seems to have been attributed to Sir Francis Baring, who in 1797 referred
    to the Bank of England as 'the dernier resort', able to provide funds to
    an entity when all other sources had been closed off," he said.
    "Early writings on the idea came from Henry Thornton (1802) and
    Walter Bagehot (1873). Thornton, writing in the late 18th and early 19th
    centuries, saw the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street as playing a
    stabilising role in times of crisis, to prevent a rapid reduction in
    credit caused by a shrinkage of the deposit base of the banking system.
    "Bagehot's classic Lombard Street appeared in 1873 with what has
    ever since been seen as the consummate statement of the responsibility of
    the lender of last resort.
    "For Bagehot, it was clear that the Bank of England should lend
    substantial liquid resources on a secured basis to a financial
    institution that had reasonable asset quality (ie was solvent) but which
    faced short-term funding difficulties.
    "Bagehot's dictum was 'Lend freely against good collateral at a
    high rate of interest'. It is frequently quoted still, and has been
    referenced more often over the past year than for a long time."
    Mr Stevens said the question remained about how to put it into
    practice.
    "The collateral involved is not necessarily going to be the
    standard sort of liquid assets. By definition, much of that collateral
    may already have been used before the bank reached the point of needing a
    loan of last resort. So the assets in question are likely to be some part
    of the bank's loan book, or some physical asset of the bank," he said.
    And he said that, since the intention is to keep the bank
    operating, the penalty should not be so big that it leaves the bank's
    interest spread between assets and liabilities negative, since that would
    actually hasten insolvency.
    "In almost all circumstances, disclosure is highly desirable: an
    informed market is a fair and efficient one," Mr Stevens added.
    "But the communications surrounding emergency liquidity
    assistance are critical in determining the chances of success. It would
    appear that it was information that the Bank of England was about to
    offer assistance to Northern Rock - which, objectively, should have
    strengthened its position compared with the alternative - that
    precipitated the queues in the streets.
    "Wholesale lenders to that institution would have already known
    that it was under pressure, but the news of official assistance told
    retail depositors, in effect, there was a problem and they reacted
    accordingly.
    "The design of the UK deposit insurance system may also have been
    a contributor, in that less than full insurance and the possibility of a
    delay in receiving insured funds can add to the incentive for a run.
    "In this complex situation, the UK authorities found it difficult
    to stabilise things, until the government issued a strong guarantee of
    Northern Rock's obligations.
    "A final issue is the re-financing of the last resort loan in the
    private sector once the situation has stabilised. If there is ongoing
    general market turmoil, as in the case in question, then it can be
    difficult for a private firm to replace the public funding at a price
    that allows the bank in question to remain viable.
    "In such an instance, the government faces the choice between
    providing the institution with longer-term support - either a long-term
    loan or taking ownership - subsidising a takeover or closing it.
    "In the UK case, Northern Rock is being taken into public
    ownership for a time.
    "In the US, the takeover of Bear Stearns - which, of course, is
    not strictly a bank - by JPMorgan Chase is being assisted by a long-term
    facility provided by the Federal Reserve, which carries some credit risk
    for the Fed. In each case, there is ongoing discussion about what value
    the previous shareholders can reasonably expect to get from the
    resolution. The prospect of legal action is, of course, a potential
    further complication.
    "All this illustrates that the role of lender of last resort is
    actually quite challenging in the modern world. Thankfully, observations
    in the time series of large financial near failures are few, and recent
    ones have been in other countries. But when they do occur, it is
    important to learn as much as we can from them. Central banks and
    supervisory authorities around the world are seeking to do just that."
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.