bit of talk yesterday about comparisons of inf and ltr deposits, here they are (bit of difference in overall grade, incl cut-off)
INF
(San Jose) - Reserve (Prob) - 37.2mt @ 0.63% Li2O (0.29% Li), 217ppm Sn (Resource (I&I) - 111.3mt @ 0.61% Li2O (0.28% Li), 206ppm Sn (0.2153% Li2O, 0.1% Li c-o))
LTR
(Kathleen Valley) - Reserve (P&P) - 68.5mt @ 1.34% Li2O, 120ppm Ta2O5 for 917.243kt Li2O, 8.274kt Ta2O5 (0.5,0.7-1.2% c-o at depth) (Resource (MI&I) - 156mt @ 1.35% Li2O, 129ppm Ta2O5 (0.55% c-o))
(Buldania) - Resource (I&I) - 14.9mt @ 0.97% Li2O, 44ppm Ta2O5 for 144.53kt Li2O (0.5% c-o)
unless i'm mistaken, inf currently own 75% of san jose, ltr 100% of both projects and inf may be limited to u/ground mining only (?)
- Forums
- ASX - Day Trading
- Day trading pre-market open March 30
bit of talk yesterday about comparisons of inf and ltr deposits,...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 52 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
AHK
ARK MINES LIMITED
Ben Emery, Executive Director
Ben Emery
Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online