bit of talk yesterday about comparisons of inf and ltr deposits, here they are (bit of difference in overall grade, incl cut-off)
INF
(San Jose) - Reserve (Prob) - 37.2mt @ 0.63% Li2O (0.29% Li), 217ppm Sn (Resource (I&I) - 111.3mt @ 0.61% Li2O (0.28% Li), 206ppm Sn (0.2153% Li2O, 0.1% Li c-o))
LTR
(Kathleen Valley) - Reserve (P&P) - 68.5mt @ 1.34% Li2O, 120ppm Ta2O5 for 917.243kt Li2O, 8.274kt Ta2O5 (0.5,0.7-1.2% c-o at depth) (Resource (MI&I) - 156mt @ 1.35% Li2O, 129ppm Ta2O5 (0.55% c-o))
(Buldania) - Resource (I&I) - 14.9mt @ 0.97% Li2O, 44ppm Ta2O5 for 144.53kt Li2O (0.5% c-o)
unless i'm mistaken, inf currently own 75% of san jose, ltr 100% of both projects and inf may be limited to u/ground mining only (?)
- Forums
- ASX - Day Trading
- Day trading pre-market open March 30
bit of talk yesterday about comparisons of inf and ltr deposits,...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 52 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)