bit of talk yesterday about comparisons of inf and ltr deposits,...

  1. 1,000 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 69
    bit of talk yesterday about comparisons of inf and ltr deposits, here they are (bit of difference in overall grade, incl cut-off)

    INF
    (San Jose) - Reserve (Prob) - 37.2mt @ 0.63% Li2O (0.29% Li), 217ppm Sn (Resource (I&I) - 111.3mt @ 0.61% Li2O (0.28% Li), 206ppm Sn (0.2153% Li2O, 0.1% Li c-o))

    LTR
    (Kathleen Valley) - Reserve (P&P) - 68.5mt @ 1.34% Li2O, 120ppm Ta2O5 for 917.243kt Li2O, 8.274kt Ta2O5 (0.5,0.7-1.2% c-o at depth) (Resource (MI&I) - 156mt @ 1.35% Li2O, 129ppm Ta2O5 (0.55% c-o))
    (Buldania) - Resource (I&I) - 14.9mt @ 0.97% Li2O, 44ppm Ta2O5 for 144.53kt Li2O (0.5% c-o)

    unless i'm mistaken, inf currently own 75% of san jose, ltr 100% of both projects and inf may be limited to u/ground mining only (?)



 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.