Not one of your better posts insaf quite a lot of incorrect assumptions, twisting and interpretations on your behalf.
.....................................
Above statement is written by the king of twisters.
You know very well timeone is not SST. You know very well that SST were doing deals with PLV and timeone.
You know very well that the "Chinese" PLV refers to are SST, yet, so that you can continue to make mischeivous, misleading posts, supported by Satori, you need to continue to insist timeone and SST are one and the same.
Deliberate distortions for the sake of deliberate distortions for the sake of stirrer posting.
Satori rates you well on your contribution, not quantity.
For me, contribution is quality and accuracy. Satori neglects these elements of your posting.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLV
- deal or no deal ?
deal or no deal ?, page-30
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 52 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
SKS
SKS Technologies wins US$90M award to supply power to international hyperscale data centre in Melbourne
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm