Timeones association with SS&T is a tecnical one that came about out of a commercial deal linked with the terms timeone agreed with plv. SS&Ts treachery doesn't mean that the board of timeone was involved. That is pure speculation. Furthermore, how do we not know that Ms Wang was not involved in the transaction associate to the Aust. Based entity? Sartori your statement considering a return to the original saviour in timeone fails to consider the above points. It assumes that timeone was in cahoots with SS&t. Can u prove that?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLV
- deal or no deal ?
deal or no deal ?, page-36
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)