Wow AT I've obviously hit a nerve. You ignore the salient point that any publication by Bond University would be cleared by the academics. Then you smear the report.
FWIW I'm not a man, so not sure why you would assume that, nor why you think adding a slur to my nic is remotely clever.
Secondly pointing the finger at others doesn't validate your claims even slightly. Only a trader would be bothered with countdowns, and you seem to have been successful in herding some LT holders into this and then taunt them if it doesn't go to plan? What plan? These are artificial deadlines brought on by boredom and taunting. They are not cast iron clad guarantees, and not meeting them is not a failure of the company. There are many matters which fall outside the control of ADO management.
Just become some holders fell into this business of betting on outcomes by fixed dates, it means I have to justify them? What a distorted view of the world you have.
LT holders know that the company is on the right path IMO because they've done the research and aren't bothered by countdowns and other nonsense. But as I pointed out, they aren't your target. It's the less well researched LT holders who have expectations raised, and then disappointed by artificial timelines which are vulnerable to your negative taunts. Many such people are not experienced investors, are time poor and have many other pressures than being in a chatroom all day.
I don't know why you think that because I point out you are very lazy with being continually negative, and are attempting to control the discussion, that I'm suddenly in charge of the thread. But because you're under pressure, it's now a case of blinding us with a mass of detail. That detail only underscores my point.
