dear oh dear, page-3

And don't forget the Big Vag getting very narky last night when pushed about doing decent quality blinded RCTs with meaningful primary outcomes and putting the results up for independent peer-review in a journal indexed on Medline (sorry: having your Russian scientist mates look at this who have a financial conflict of interest just doesn't cut it) - seems he thinks that the 70 years of (mostly unpublished) research into BioNotVeryEffectives is enough despite none of it ever looking at the healing of liver disease - presenting changes in liver enzymes (from just one study) which are a poor proxy of liver healing and withholding data from the control group (as done in investor presentations) is misleading at best and fraud at worst.

And as for Dr Kiwi - she can look forward to a 'please explain' from the NZ Medical Registration Board: owning shares in a company, promoting their product, and now likely having involvement with distribution and at the same time recommending it to patients? Grossly unethical and sort of behaviour that can lead to deregistration. So her daughter's liver healed 'faster than expected' - don't expect she presented any historical control data on normal rate of lacerated liver healing in healthy teenagers (with standard deviations of course) so it can be seen how likely or unlikely a quicker rate of healing of ONE person equated to? Pathetic: SLA reverting to anecdotes to flog their product and convince the world - the Emperor's clothes were seen for what they are last night.