Share
11,738 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 10
clock Created with Sketch.
04/10/23
14:13
Share
Originally posted by Johilo returned:
↑
And I say TheYes proponents are justifying a reason to do something ( whatever it is ) by the telling of lies. One, fifteen, sixteen, twenty five, hundred and twenty six ...pages - which one of those is the truth? "I did not spit at you" = lie. There is no treaty and reparations as a part of this - says Albo This is about treaty and reparations -says Mayo. Mayo is one of the architects... Albo hasn' read it. Someone, some hundreds, some hundreds of thousands are telling lies, and it is from the YES side. Since the Yes Side has not offered anything concrete, what?, can be considered a lie by any undecided or No position holder? How can one lie about something that is non existent.. Your lies, others' questions...it's that simple. "Truth telling" after this debacle is unlikely to be accepted as easily as the previous history/legend/dreamtime of the early aboriginal settler/claimants has been. Considerably more proof will be required by people judging by the reluctance shown lately to accept apparent deceptive tales of "truth" and the "polishing" of some elements forming part of the narrative. Or, maybe Australians just a walking away from the negativity. Positivity like that of Price and Mundine will garnish support rather than the deception and negativity of the old school commies, Langton, Pearson et.al.
Expand
Come off it matey....what is spitting at somebody got to do with telling lies about the Voice? Put your head on mate. The woman denying what she did was a blight on her, nothing to do with the Voice. Do you have any more silly examples of apparent lies by the Yes side?