Deeply worrying fisheries law proposal, page-58

If your research was a little deeper maybe your attempted fabricated narrative may sound more convincing.

For the last year everyone has been commenting on the financial desperation of Greenland and therefore a rationale as into why they would turn towards mining. Have you been missing these hundred odd posts?

Further with limited natural resources. IA are forced to turn to mining.

Further still, if Greenland are financially restricted. Are they really wanting to take on a massive loss for gross misconduct towards ETM.

All of these are clearly suggestive towards an eventual acceptance that ETM has a very valid case.

If you consider this logic desperate. I would suggest it is less desperate as you creatng a narrative that counters these clear and obvious facts.
Try better. I know you might lose your job if iA is voted out. But that's your concern not ours and no false narrative will help you..