Defamation Against Opthea Will Be Reported

  1. 2,753 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 209
    Opthea’s Phase 3 clinical trial did not meet its primary endpoint. However, the trial was conducted under the strictest international standards, including a double blinded, multi centre, randomised controlled design, overseen by independent regulatory and ethical bodies. The methodology and data integrity are not in question, and any suggestion otherwise is factually incorrect and legally reckless.Recent defamatory comments targeting Opthea, its staff, or its operations are unacceptable and will not be ignored. Publicly accusing individuals or the company of misconduct without evidence is a serious civil offence under Australian defamation law. Those engaging in such conduct should understand that legal remedies are available to the company and its officers, including court-ordered damages, public retractions, and cost recovery.Every defamatory post will be documented and formally reported to Opthea for internal review and potential legal escalation. Anyone making false or malicious statements in a public forum should be prepared to defend them in court. Critique the science if you must, but if you cross the line into defamation, expect consequences.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.