Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

defamation, page-95

First 95 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jimk3758

22,719 Posts.

83

17/11/20

12:17

Post #: 48927836
Share

Originally posted by peter pumpkinhead: ↑

There's nothing to stop you from raising a director's past record by presenting the facts, just have to be careful not to get involved in too much interpretation, name calling etc.

As an occasional "downramper", I agree its tough enough to have to cop the abuse from aggressive posters without restrictions being placed on what you can say. It certainly doesn't run the other way. No-one gets sued for being overly complementary about a company (ramping), though this form of dishonesty is the real cause of people losing money in scams. Stick to the facts and "fair comment" (which covers the kinds of opinions analysts express) and there shouldn't be a problem though.

Expand

@peter pumpkinhead what was the end result and who were the plaintiff lawyers?
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

SXG

From the Floor question: "Could gold be manufactured in a lab like diamonds?"

FEX

From the Floor question: "When will FEX start using rail to augment & de-risk their haulage solution?" | Fenix Resources

AL8

From the Floor question: "What is the focus of AL8 and how is management going to attract shareholders to the registry?" | Alderan Resources

CC9

The USA's dominance requires a domestic lithium supply chain. Chariot stands to benefit

Chris Judd's Talk Ya Book: Tracking Life360 on a journey to the stars

First 95 Last

SPONSORED BY