Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

@peter pumpkinhead what was the end result and who were the...

First 95 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jimk3758

23,128 Posts.

83

17/11/20

12:17

Post #: 48927836
Share

Originally posted by peter pumpkinhead: ↑

There's nothing to stop you from raising a director's past record by presenting the facts, just have to be careful not to get involved in too much interpretation, name calling etc.

As an occasional "downramper", I agree its tough enough to have to cop the abuse from aggressive posters without restrictions being placed on what you can say. It certainly doesn't run the other way. No-one gets sued for being overly complementary about a company (ramping), though this form of dishonesty is the real cause of people losing money in scams. Stick to the facts and "fair comment" (which covers the kinds of opinions analysts express) and there shouldn't be a problem though.

Expand

@peter pumpkinhead what was the end result and who were the plaintiff lawyers?
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

RCE

Recce's R327 found effective against E.coli during clinical trial

LRV

Larvotto identifies new exploration target at NSW's Hillgrove, boosting shares by nearly 20%

SS1

Sun Silver gets that drill to thrill feeling from high grade hits at Maverick Spring

LU7

Lithium Universe (ASX:LU7) board visits Quebec to engage key stakeholders

Week 26 Wrap: Cerberus of inflation barks – rents, electricity & fuel – and world watches two elders bicker

First 95 Last

SPONSORED BY