delay with mining, page-78

LDKS, suprised by your continued ability to studiously ignore the facts.

Legend HAS abandoned slurry. There is no mention of it in any of the recent material, including the last presentation, and BMO's report in November last year.

As these two items attempt to put a capital cost on LGDI's project, there would be a reference to slurry as a pipeline is a significant piece of capital. What they do refer to is a road/rail solution, which is what they are concentrating on.

However as to your post, you are clearly trying to subtly draw attention _away_ from the fact that Minemakers have some quite powerful relationships who are happy to help them to achieve a low capex operation, which will become BOTH a low capex and low opex one in a couple of years. The talk of slurry is a dead end, because there are better solutions. Rail was good enough for Fortesque so it should do for MAK as well.

You really need to do better research before making these awkward comparisons that serve no purpose.