Demokraatit and Trump deal

Do the Democrats support ETMs project and/or uranium mining?

Heres the good news...Trump is seemingly getting Greenlands only worthy identified, defined and ready to go rare earth project there is in Greenland.

I cant see how this wont end up in a deal with ETM getting their mining license. Every bit of good news has fallen into place so far.

Trump couldnt have hoped for a better political ooutcome in Greenland (as he states below) and neither could ETM holders!

in campaign documents, the party said it would be open to dialogue with the U.S. on commercial interests.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/greenland-votes-pro-business-independence-parties-trump-interest-looms-2025-03-12/?fbclid=IwY2xjawJAGQxleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHTBipLahFdDsOWvp2-BG9oRhzScrJ3H4w6GcSQbiruA4kgfc3-Oe4EoIPQ_aem_2WDJ6y-uOT2H5KdxY3j5tQ

The election result has moved business development and the mining agenda to the centre of Greenlandic politics.

"If you add up the election result, voters were driven by business development and independence. And that's good news for Trump," said Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen, a professor in political science at the University of Copenhagen. "From a White House perspective, this is probably the best result you could hope for."


"If Trump can negotiate an agreement that gives the U.S. assurances that Greenland will not open up its society to Chinese bases, Chinese mines or Russian influence, then it's sort of under control. And then Trump can... say that he has gained access to minerals.""The Democrats want reforms that will help create a self-sustaining economy by stimulating private sector growth, particularly in the mining sector"The party, which has also advocated for closer ties with Europe, voted against a 2021 ban on uranium mining that halted development of Kvanefjeld

They voted AGAINST the uranium ban. They clearly see its not helping the country and want it gone and the most proKvanefjeld party there is having broken ties with Siumut (the other pro party) in 2021 because Siumut werent pushing the project through as fast as they wanted..

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/greenland-votes-pro-business-independence-parties-trump-interest-looms-2025-03-12/?fbclid=IwY2xjawJAGZdleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHQ0F-SwqchdTCl11-_LnK-y-udZtzJHxk82MB3OkdKblw3EYATk0LQ6ITA_aem_57jJMwwqcGtduUJ6lsAIGQ
https://www.wsj.com/us-news/greenland-has-the-makings-of-a-mining-boom-so-where-is-everyone-8d07d07d
Nielsen, a former mining minister, said in a television debate on Tuesday: “Greenland needs to stand together in a time of great interest from the outside. There is a need for unity, so we will enter into negotiations with everyone
https://www.ft.com/content/d0c96260-a5d1-42a1-b13f-735a9e1ab68f

That didn’t stop Trump from suggesting during a Thursday Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte that Greenland’s election that it was “very good” for “us” and “the person who did the best is a very good person, as far as we’re concerned.” Trump nonetheless noted that the U.S. already has a considerable military presence in Greenland and added, “Maybe you’ll see more and more soldiers going there. I don’t know.”
https://apnews.com/article/greenland-election-demokraatit-trump-arctic-13c295cbc716db2c8011be5819e11fef

Donald Trump said he believes there will be an annexation of Greenland.

The president himself does not use the word annexation, which means incorporating a land area into one's own state, but is asked about his thoughts on a "possible annexation".

"I think it will happen," Trump said, according to Reuters.

The statements come during a meeting at the White House with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

https://www.sermitsiaq.ag/samfund/trump-tror-pa-amerikansk-annektering-af-gronland/2208633

I cant see how a deal can not eventuate at this point
$11 a share evaluation looking ever more promising