depth, page-85

I could not disagree with you more.

Those contentions are, by definition, baseless.

If the 'research' (and I use that term extremely liberally)document you refer to had evidence then it/you/others would not be referring to 'anomalies' but to the evidence.

There is nothing abnormal with CDU securities trading. There is no evidence to support such a contention.

There is, however, voluminous evidence of a certain poster making unsubstantiated claims as to the size and nature of the resource. There is voluminous evidence of the company repeatedly missing deadlines which it has for itself. What are your opinions of these things Max when you turn your mind to them? Are you somehow implying the company is colluding with the evil shorters/accumulators by constantly missing their own deadlines?

Simply not understanding the machinations of capital markets is not evidence of any wrongdoing by market participants in my view and the logical flaws in the arguments in that 'research' document are self evident.