Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Derchowitz says 144 legal scholars are wrong, page-31

First 31 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Wazdan

7,337 Posts.

95

10/02/21

20:59

Post #: 50875609
Share

Originally posted by Orson ↑

Hey moon, if you didn't work it out yet, my post was a clap back to a Monty Python gag, "And now, a massage from the Swedish Prime Minister."

It's also a reference to the allegations of Virginia Giuffre about the massages given to Dershowitz as part of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking of minors.

However, my reticence to take any note of his opinions is not because of Dershowitz's alleged sexual abuse of Epstein's minors. Or his enthusiastic lifelong defence of men who are alleged to have committed violence (including murder) to women - O J Simpson, Claus von Bulow, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein etc.

My personal revulsion at Dershowitz is he seems to provide legal opinions on demand that suit his ideological or personal needs. Ever since his illegal plea deal suppressing dozens of Epstein's girls naming the men they were abused by, he has been feverishly defending Trump. It's like something else is going on when Trump and Dershowitz are involved.

So I am happy to listen to other constitutional scholars with less of a personal agenda in their opinions.

Expand

bull shit

2 minute time line and then tries to justify it,

JUSTIFY ,

Great series,

go quick draw,

ah now i get it

Quick draw orson!!!
3 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...

First 31 Last