descending triangle target 29.5c, page-67

Haven't really had a chance to read the thread, other than the original post by botfodder.

I must say I am surprised it is still going and kept going over the weekend as I dismissed it immediately as inaccurate TA. No Descending triangle in my book over the period indicated:

1. No clear downward trendline in the period indicated = too many (false) breakouts......

2. Too much "whitespace"

Also

Descending Triangles can lead to a breakout EITHER WAY with a downward move only being 64% of the time.

- Read Bullkowski :)

I am more inclined to look at the larger descending triangle - from LYC's ATH if at all.......

Now I will read Mitta's comments.....coz I wanted to test myself:) lol