A 400,000 growth number today should have the same influence to the property market as a 200,000 growth number when the population was 10 mill.
So given the population growth rates have been averaging around 2% over the last 50 years(when immigration started in earnest) - what happened in the past 3 years to property prices, to my way of thinking, was unusual and extreme.
I think the new factors over the last two or three years were historically low interest rates and the first home owner's grant - plus maybe some money being scared out of the equity markets may have found its way into property.
I also don't underestimate the role rampant property spruiking by the real estate industry and "hot property" tv shows etc.. talking about immigration and population growth
as if it's a new demand driver.
In the 70's and 80's there was high inflation which was the big driver - with wages rising rapidly , the rents and house prices naturally followed... and you still had a similar population growth rate back then, so it made sense back then for the house prices to go up - otherwise you'd pay off a house in 2 years.
Does it make sense that it will now continue - with the higher interest rates and record household debt levels ?
- Forums
- Property
- dick smith on why houses expensive
A 400,000 growth number today should have the same influence to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
HCH
Hot Chili sets up water company as drought racks Chile–but must also build communities a desal plant
CXO
Core Lithium narrowly beats guidance on FY24 spodumene production but 1Y returns still shattered
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online