Did Jesus actually exist?

Originally posted by Glyco ↑

Please read again, the context, have a good day.

"Skepticism related to Jesus of Nazareth generally takes one of two forms:
those who don’t even believe He ever existed,
and those who acknowledge Jesus as an historical figure but deny He is God.
In a prior post I assembled all the articles here at ColdCaseChristianity.com defending the Deity of Jesus. The case for the Deity of Christ is centered on the Resurrection, but there are many other cumulative circumstantial factors to consider....."

~

Just in case, for the skeptics:

EASTER:

"..
To summarise, one is left to say that the only rational conclusion is that the witnesses to the resurrection of Jesus Christ are witnesses of the highest credibility.

If we are unable to accept their histories, why would we accept the histories of any other incident in the human race?

Millions of Christians of all denominations celebrate the events of Easter.
They remember time and again the facts surrounding the crucifixion, death, burial and resurrection of our Lord. When on Easter Sunday we hear the declaration ringing in our ears once again:
‘The Lord is risen’,
it is comforting to know that on the basis of highly credible evidence, we can confidently respond:
‘He is risen indeed.’

~

Mr/Judge Clarrie Briese

~
Can we believe the Gospels - creation.com

https://creation.com/can-we-believe-the-gospels

Mar 28, 2007 - Clarrie Briese, B.A., Diploma of Criminology (Cantab), A.O., is a former Chief Magistrate (judge)¹ of N.S.W., Australia (now retired). He is renowned in Australia for his work in rooting out corruption—no matter where it was found—and in Christian circles for defeating a high-profile humanist attempt to destroy creation ministry with lies (see interview, Blowing the whistle on corruption). Here he applies his formidable legal knowledge to the testimony of the Apostles.

~

Easter is actually Passover.
Jesus is the Passover Lamb (of God).

~

Expand

Please read again, the context,

"Skepticism related to Jesus of Nazareth generally takes one of two forms:
those who don’t even believe He ever existed,
and those who acknowledge Jesus as an historical figure but deny He is God.

And that I did again and your opener above very quickly and clearly sets the stage, two forms and I was addressing the second.
A lot of people including non-Christians are aware of the likes of the two verse references I gave you, so immediately the question arises, if there are inconsistencies or conflicting information right at the beginning of your material, what credibility can one expect to find in the rest of the material/links you provide.

I personally, when I see this sort of thing, don't bother reading any further.
I did look a little further though, to see if the Opening points or 2 was addressed, it appeared not unless I gave up to early.