You pasted: "I think you don't have the qualifications to act as a Judge to give such a statement because your bias - as a rejector of the existence of your creator and his signs - are evident."
in response to DBT's statement: "He existed but clearly was not a 'holy' man or a prophet of God. God of course being an unproven claim, and if the word 'holy' includes being decent and moral, Mohammad was neither."
Tell us why DBT's statement about Mohammad being neither a prophet of God nor of being holy is false irrespective of his rejection or acceptance of a creator.
After all, many Christians agree with DBT's statement about Mohammad in spite of believing in their creator. Clearly a belief is a personal creator is not the only criteria for assessing the truth or falsehood of DBT's statement about Mohammad.
