... I mean maybe that would be nice for the proportionally few people who might loose a tax discount but super and tax in general changes frequently...
If you consider the proper 'start' in 1992 with super guarantee act (there was some old thing tho but less adoption), it's not even 40 yet.
i guess my argument is that the point of super is so that taxpayer, worker, investor, business whatever doesn't have to fork out as much tax dollars for state pensions. That's the point it was designed for. It does that pretty well and puts a strong stable base under the stock market too (at the big in end of town at least)
if people who a) have 3million + and are b) savvy enough to know to put assets in super for the best tax treatment pay a little more or are inconvenienced by having to pay their accouantnts (Services economy benefits!) to restructure their tax minimising vehicles. Kinda fine with me and should be pretty fine for all but the smallest portion of super users.
Which is a good way to state it, are you using it for tax minimising or are you using it for retirement. Coz it's supposed to be for one of those.
