and of course the headline of Horton's words would be absolutely...

and of course the headline of Horton's words would be absolutely true. reports on experimental hypotheses at the more pure end of science, some of which are failed and given as discussion on methods and variables etc, some more include contentious issues such as was climate science in the early days, and more that offer examination and seeking other researchers to try the same experiments. and of course science as you say is an evolving study and new discoveries, through the aforesaid process, can potentially disprove what is now taken as proven.

if these things didn't get published no-one would know about them.

yet some nong had to twist it to mean something malicious. propaganda Wal.

what I really don't understand is why you find it impossible to accept any works from people who have studied their whole lives dedicating their efforts to global betterment, eg wifi, and yet you believe these malicious distortions and somehow causing you to take them literally.