Impressive results from the drug ONC 201 - that will compliment...

Impressive results from the drug ONC 201 - that will compliment paxalisib in the PNOC study - see very bottom. It is a very detailed lab study, from the Koschmann lab , MOTT HOSPITAL / UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN. Matt Dun quick to offer congrats on twitter.

So reason for great excitement - given what the combo study should deliver. Matt Dun and others have provided scientific papers that eloquently explain - how these 2 drugs complement each other.

----------------------------
Some other comments - Chimenix (ONC 201) have themselves in an awkward situation - coy about this 325 person combo PNOC study, in fact.

A phase 3 study, however, was established by Chimenix- (ONC 201 mono study) in 450 patients ( DIPG/DMG ) - was announced in early 2021 - and is well underway. Results in 2025.

From what I can establish - the ONC201/Paxalisib PNOC was put into place around or just after that time, So the company Chimenix has this very expensive phase 3 study deep in progress - which seemingly will go head-to-head with the PNOC trial.

Not helping much I think -  Matt Dun has released research and video that theIR dopamine receptor ONC201, can be substituted to likely also be effective in combo with paxalisib.

You can see in the story below - the limited type of cancer mutation that ONC201 targets .... Chimenix has $200m cash - but being spent on a questionable Phase 3 study  (my words obviously)

- this long awaited PNOC data, may see Chimenix do two things, what may they be .........ending the phase 3 study and doing a deal to get  their hands on paxalisib. Coy alright, about PNOC.
Yes I see this drug leaving its Aust headquarters at a super cheap price (but at least a SP much higher than delay - to end this sad saga of company underperformance)



Study finds improved survival for incurable brain tumor, providing ‘a crack in the armor’

Clinical trials show longer survival in patients with diffuse midline glioma treated with ONC201; study also explains underlying mechanism of the drug’s success
August 16, 2023 10:00 AM
Author|
Nicole Fawcett

Progressive brain scans show the tumor responding to treatment with ONC201. Credit: Rogel Cancer Center
For the first time, researchers have found a potential drug candidate that improved outcomes for patients with a type of childhood brain tumor for which there are no effective treatments.
The compound, called ONC201, nearly doubled survival for patients with diffuse midline glioma or diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, compared to previous patients.
The findings are reported by an international team of researcher led by the University of Michigan Health Rogel Cancer Center and the Chad Carr Pediatric Brain Tumor Center.
In addition to reporting on the results of two early stage clinical trials, the paper reveals the underlying mechanisms behind the compound’s success in these tumors.
The paper is published in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
Diffuse midline gliomas including DIPG with a mutation called H3K27M are particularly aggressive, with an overall survival rate of 11-15 months.
These tumors are most frequently found in children and young adults. The only available treatment is radiation, and even that is difficult as the tumors are located amid brain regions with critical functions.
“It’s an incredibly difficult tumor to treat,” said senior author Carl Koschmann, M.D., associate professor of pediatric neuro-oncology and clinical scientific director of the Chad Carr Pediatric Brain Tumor Center at Michigan Medicine.
“Prior to this study, there have been more than 250 clinical trials that have not been able to improve outcomes. These results are potentially a major crack in the armor,” explained Koschmann, who is also a pediatric neuro-oncologist at U-M Health C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital.
In two clinical trials testing ONC201 in a total of 71 patients with H3K27M-mutated diffuse midline gliomas, the median overall survival was nearly 22 months for tumors that had not recurred at the time of enrollment. Almost a third of the patients lived longer than two years.
ONC201 took an unusual path to a clinical trial.
Initially designed to target dopamine receptors, which are upregulated in many different tumors, researchers saw that the drug passes the blood-brain barrier, one of the biggest challenges to designing drugs for brain tumors.
Initial trials in glioblastoma were not successful, but a small number of patients with DMG that carried the H3K27M mutation had more promising results. Without understanding why it worked better in these patients, a phase 1 trial was started in children and young adults with H3K27M-mutated DMG.
Meanwhile, Koschmann and co-author Sriram Venneti, M.D., Ph.D., were trying to figure out what was happening in these tumor cells.
Through the trial, they collected cerebrospinal fluid from patients.
They used this fluid to analyze metabolic changes and found ONC201 got into the tumor cells and affected mitochondria. Patients who responded to the drug had an increase in a metabolite called L-2HG produced by tumor cells.
SEE ALSO: Spinal fluid sampling used to track treatment response in pediatric glioma
Koschmann called the finding “very much unexpected.”
The team found that increased L-2HG reversed tumor defining epigenetic signals causing tumor cells to differentiate more and divide less. The longer patients were on ONC201, the more tumors exhibited these epigenetic reversals.
“This could explain why this patient population was responding so well to the drug, because it had this specific epigenetic abnormality that could be turned off by ONC201. The tumors have an epigenetic change caused by the H3K27M mutation and ONC201 metabolically undoes that change,” said Venneti, associate professor of pathology and pediatrics and scientific research director of the Chad Carr Pediatric Brain Tumor Center at Michigan Medicine.
Additional clinical trials are currently underway, including testing ONC201 in combination with other therapies.
Researchers at U-M’s Chad Carr Pediatric Brain Tumor Center are also continuing to look at ways to overcome resistance to ONC201 by using drug combinations.
Koschmann notes that even a near-doubling of survival is not enough for families of patients with this diagnosis, as the tumor remains very lethal. But he hopes this first step will lead to bigger leaps in the future.
“For now we have this patient population that didn’t have a drug before, and now we see many of the tumors responding. We have a platform to build on and we can also explain why it’s working,” he said.
“We are really excited about this study and envision ONC201 becoming standard of care for these patients in the near future,” Venneti said.
Additional authors: Abed Rahman Kawakibi, Sunjong Ji, Sebastian M. Waszak, Stefan R. Sweha, Mateus Mota, Matthew Pun, Akash Deogharkar, Chan Chung, Rohinton S. Tarapore, Samuel Ramage, Andrew Chi, Patrick Y. Wen, Isabel Arrillaga-Romany, Tracy T. Batchelor, Nicholas A. Butowski, Ashley Sumrall, Nicole Shonka, Rebecca A. Harrison, John de Groot, Minesh Mehta, Matthew D. Hall, Doured Daghistani, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Benjamin M. Ellingson, Kevin Beccaria, Pascale Varlet, Michelle M. Kim, Yoshie Umemura, Hugh Garton, Andrea Franson, Jonathan Schwartz, Rajan Jain, Maureen Kachman, Heidi Baum, Charles F. Burant, Sophie L. Mottl, Rodrigo T. Cartaxo, Vishal John, Dana Messinger, Tingting Qin, Erik Peterson, Peter Sajjakulnukit, Karthik Ravi, Alyssa Waugh, Dustin Walling, Yujie Ding, Ziyun Xia, Anna Schwendeman, Debra Hawes, Fusheng Yang, Alexander R. Judkins, Daniel Wahl, Costas A. Lyssiotis, Daniel de la Nava, Marta M. Alonso, Augustine Eze, Jasper Spitzer, Susanne V. Schmidt, Ryan J. Duchatel, Matthew D. Dun, Jason E. Cain, Li Jiang, Sylwia A. Stopka, Gerard Baquer, Michael S. Regan, Mariella G. Filbin, Nathalie Y. R. Agar, Lili Zhao, Chandan Kumar-Sinha, Rajen Mody, Arul Chinnaiyan, Ryo Kurokawa, Drew Pratt, Viveka N. Yadav, Jacques Grill, Cassie Kline, Sabine Mueller, Adam Resnick, Javad Nazarian, Joshua E. Allen, Yazmin Odia, Sharon L. Gardner