It's not a matter of being an optimist or a pessimist, it's a...

It's not a matter of being an optimist or a pessimist, it's a matter of knowing what the value of the asset we all partly own has.

Either we get an offer approximating that value, or we hold on to the asset. Simple as that. No-one here can tell you which one it's going to be though.

It is an established principle of contract law that if there is a breach of contract, the court will attempt to put back the aggrieved party back to the position they would have been in had that breach not occurred. I don't make this stuff up doods.

If the court finds AGS lawfully terminated its agreement with Quasar, in my opinion, we will get back (or are appropriately compensated for) the lost percentage of B4M. That's not optimism or pessimism, it's the way contract law works. What I can't tell you, though, is if AGS did, in fact, lawfully terminate it's agreement.