Re: “masterstock broker” implacations.
Did you say that because you categorically know it to be true, or is it something your believe to be true in your own opinion (for which ever reason you do are your own and worthy of respect).
I’m unsure as to whether your mentioned positively n that your consider his recent choices as a barometer to measure BIT positive of negatively.
One third of the Directors previous holdings is still a substantial investment. How does retaining 1/3rd of holding stacking in sentiment vs the 2/3rd he sold - genuinely interest In learning how you determine a value on these things.
FWIW, selling 2/3 of your holding at massive profit can implicate to their being less action behind the scenes that we would all hope. There’s no legitimate evidence to support this just yet however, while the direct can legally continue trade, we know that it is likely that have yet to progress from prospecting commercial partners to negotiating with a potential partner(s).
Thats not to say, suggest at all why the director sold. It may have no link at all. It could be a combination of the two. The combination of his age and personal expectation of times may know longer meet his immediate needs.
While it maybe true that he is a Master Trade. I wouldn’t choose to reject that claim on face value, but said, but I need a lot more to believe it. I haven an open mind to the idea but I’m not there yet -a) because I don’t have enough information of his trading success. And only information I do have is he invested in a BIO company that lived way in the 10M death cap and even nearly tabked a few times... and then high (well high, but lower than he could have) soon after pretty much after the first nugget of go news in a years...
It’s a fairly basic play. Most just try to do it is less that like 6 years ... And he stil 1/3 deep in the game.
