Hi REO,"One member's thought is so repugnantly expressed, with...

Hi REO,

"One member's thought is so repugnantly expressed, with zero evidence, and yet so forcefully backed up by another member, it's almost as if it's the same person using two profiles..."

I actually thought you were referring to mugtrader and evilopinions, as their view on the number of 3b notices released by OBJ is remarkably similar...

I have provided ample of evidence here backing up my arguments. Look at the number of 3B's filed in 1.5 years. ~ evilopinions

Maybe sellers were tired of all the appendix 3B's. I know I am and I don't even hold these shares. ~ mugtrader

And what's even more remarkable about the shared view of these two posters is that one can only deduce from these comments that they both appear to have an issue with retail investors owning shares in the company.

It's a pretty simple deduction, really

1. The directors do not own any of the company's listed options (ASX:OBJOA).

2. As reported in OBJ's most recent Annual Report ownership of these options are spread among 364 shareholders.