AKA. Instead of posting incorrect information about Tony's holdings on HC and then looking like a dill when you have to correct it, why not email Tony instead?
Despite you being a non holder, Tony may be willing to waste his time outlining his holdings and how it breaks down in terms of personal holdings and his SMSF.
Then you could answer your own question instead of insinuating that Tony doesn't have sufficient "skin in the game". It's such a ridiculous inference to make. Are you suggesting that if Tony or any other PLV staffer doesn't have millions of dollars tied up in company stock they are going to give anything less than 100%?
It's a real slur on each employee's character, especially given the financial sacrifices some employees have had to make over the past few months. I understand that everyone is entitled to their opinion on PLV, but this inference crosses a line.
Tony's salary has been debated for years on HC. It's completely irrelevant to the current share price of a stock which of course...you do not hold.
If anyone objects to Tony's salary, attend the AGM and speak against it. Otherwise, accept he gets paid more than you do. Welcome to the real world.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLV
- directors report
directors report, page-44
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 49 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)