Directors, page-6

Maybe have another read of what I have posted across the 2 seperate posts and look at the spreadsheet grabs again but to answer your points:

1: I thought; re: "I am a new investor of Kairos Minerals" was clear, and as such no I have never voted at either a Kairos Annual General Meeting nor General Meeting. I agree that the options and rights issued were either approved or ratified (whatever the case may be) by a overwhelming majority of shareholders that could be bothered to actually vote. I will suggest that any resolutions proposed by the Company at future meetings will also have an overwhelming majority vote in favour even more so that the Top 20 hold nearly 40% of SOI & the top 3 holders (22.59%) would no doubt use the services of "proxy advisors" plus some of the current Top 20 were supporters of the removal of Topping and Senegue in 2022.

2: Not once have I inferred, suggested nor made comments about shareholders rights to vote how they see fit, nor have I either indicated, inferred, suggested or said that shareholders should have voted against the issue of either the options or performance rights (see opening sentence above)
Making comments and referencing the Corporations Act and the ASX Corporate Governance principles is hardly trying to educate anyone, but for your information, the Company acknowledged the issuing of performance rights was contrary to the said guidelines, hardly a good corporate governance action but it appears you are comfortable with the Company's deviations.

3: It was my point that the issuing of the options & performance right hasn't achieved the purpose of them being issued, as per the share price chart on the original post, the share price has been stagnant for 3 years since Topping and Senegue were removed (resigned) and Lewis and Coulson were appointed in their places. As for Directors getting diddly squat, the get remunerated for their services regardless of any shareholder wealth creation.

At this point, I will say that the fees for Directors of Kairos are uniquely lower than those of their peers.
Furthermore, options and performance rights in general have a expiry date that is 3 years post the grant date, more than ample time for shareholder wealth creation and the vesting conditions being met.

4: Shareholders indeed can vote for the re-election of a director at the Annual General Meeting, as per the Corporations Act, the Company's Board Charter and the ASX Listing Rules but as per my opinion of voting patterns (item 1 above) it would be extremely unlikely for a director not to be re-elected given the structure of the Top 20 and the required percentages to defeat any ordinary resolutions proposed.

re: " If you read the conditions attached to the rights issued to the new Chair you’ll find it will be subject to shareholder approval."
I am more than aware of the conditions of the Performance Rights being issued to Simon Lill, as it was indicated on the spreadsheet grab embedded in the original post. But for your benefit, I have added to this post .. .. .. .. see highlight yellow text.



Again, there will be little to no chance of the Performance Rights to be issued to Simon Lill won't be approved.

For what it is worth, I (and a few friends) have predominately only taken a position in Kairos Minerals due to Lill's appointment.

On a final note, you may approve of Company's skirting around their Corporate Governance obligations, or the rules and regulations of the regulatory bodies that govern disclosing entities but I will voice my concerns to the Company and/or ASX and/or ASIC when I deem it necessary.