Should the Greenlanders trust the EIA by GGG with these figures?
The standard for the EIA was set by Greenland and Greenland did accept the EIA from GGG and moved it to public hearings.
So you are saying Greenland are idiots when they accepted the EIA, they fail to investigate the EIA findings of what was to be the biggest mine containing uranium?
Sounds like it's a second bite of an apple if you can't keep the mine closed on the first try.
Where we are today that matters, new government and public hearings that should be ongoing.
"Dirty" or "non-dirty" REE-uranium mining by GGG, the EIA facts facts and truth behind EIA?, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 252 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.2¢ |
Change
-0.001(4.35%) |
Mkt cap ! $30.89M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.3¢ | 2.3¢ | 2.1¢ | $37.78K | 1.681M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1510902 | 2.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2¢ | 50951 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ETM (ASX) Chart |