disappointing, page-58

So,

if we agree with T4P ... everything is OK.
But if we disagree we must have a big agenda - and collaborating too!

It's ok for T4P to accuse anyone who disagrees with him of having low morals, or doing inadequate research. But not OK the other way round?

T4P's research is spot on too. Just look at the +ve posts he put on CAZ ... and the attacks he would make on people who posted negatively on it.

Looking forward to the next 2 page newspaper article highlighting the way you behave T4P.

T4P posts are either: consipiracy theory, pretty diagram or an attack the integrity of someone who doesn't agree with him:

Let's look at something from CDU...
http://www.hotcopper.com.au/post_thread.asp?fid=1&tid=344249#1168098

"Clearly CDU is in the hands of less than genuine players here...they want our shares, but do not want to pay for them."
"lol"
"Clearly manipulative practices effecting the "normal trading patterns" thet one would expect from genuine market participants...about time the ASX stepped in inb my opinion!"


And your piece de resistance: This posting on CAZ from November 05:

http://www.hotcopper.com.au/post_thread.asp?fid=1&tid=259236#811636

"Techno8..."
"LOL... [Quoting techno8]"I read that RIO Tinto will fight this case for many years if it has to, all the way through the Court systems and has a legal precedent to rely upon. The matter might drag on for years."

"lol...care to enlighten us on the "legal precedent"...and by the way, "fight" whom?"

"More rubbsh from the gallery...probably a good buy signal?"

"Cheers!"

T4P .... lol

T4P exposed ... Conspiracy, Ramp, Sledge, Piccy!