“it's the means by which a Transcendent, Infinite, Unfathomable Father might become Finite, Fathomable and amongst us WITHOUT having to change His nature.”
I would suggest you have twisted and manipulated the way in which Waffle was presenting the above.
All the above was done and achievable, simply by God dwelling in Jesus, a human Temple John 14:10.
No way did God become this Temple or flesh.
God the Father is Word -> The word.
Jesus had the Fathers word without measure, so when he expressed them out, he BECAME the express image of God's PERSON (Heb 1:3 KJV).
God's person, includes all of the bolded above.
-------------
The Trinity is Not biblical and neither was it taught with or by the apostles and we know this by the words of the Bible.
"
Ignatius of Antioch"
It is recorded that his only 7 letters, his writings mind you and not the Bibles, had been corrupted at some point, rendering any said support or back up from him, Useless and unreliable.
------------------
God's end game to be all in all -> this verse in no way is in reference to Jesus being all in all, it is God the Father all in all and Jesus is subject to him, the one that put all things initially under him.
We will be in each other, but this verse is Not speaking of us or Jesus. (John 17:20-23's truth of "I and the Father are one" = In word, which Jesus also wants us to be).
--------------
The early church is as outlined in the Bible, no more and no less, and not your quote as above, that you mention.
-----------------
Reason that the trinity concoction wasn't taught you say -> what a load of rubbish, that's just another BIG spill as you know there is NO evidence pre the 100's, other than the Bible, which contradicts your trinity.
---------------
"And no, its not a CC creation, its right there in the Gospel, if you read it in the sense it was written,
"
The evidence from the Bible, shows that you lot, do not do as above.
"Sense it was written" -> This now in the eternal life that they should know You (father) the Only True God and whom you have sent, Jesus Christ.
The way that is written and to be understood, is the same back then as it is today = Jesus clearly showing that he is Not God, not God in the flesh etc, etc.
But what do you lot say????????????????????????? 
---------------
"We also see that there can be no more ancient title of almighty God than that of “Father,” and it is through the Son that He is Father,"
Goodness gracious, this is like reading words directly from satan in your post here. 
Rev 19:6 - Then I heard what sounded like a great multitude, like the roar of rushing waters and like loud peals of thunder, shouting: “Hallelujah! For our Lord (Yehowah) God Almighty reigns.
21:22 - [SIZE=16px]And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord (Yehowah) God [/SIZE][B]Almighty[/B][SIZE=16px] and the Lamb are the temple of it.
(hmm looky here, One God Almighty made up of ONE and not Jesus).
Almighty God and Father are one in the same, the Only True God that Jesus references in John 17:3, when he was here, so the ancient title still stands and on it's same merits.
He is a Father in his own right[/SIZE]
