Seriously why do all these standards need to be set? Exped already have outlined benefits for the users of there product. So this could be juat more red tape and hurdles for xped. Just so a bunch of people to form a committee to put red tape here and there etc. Exped get on with it and move forwaed and let them catch the hell up.
There was another post who refered the ranking system of intel partners to a AMWAY convention and i must admit its looking like exactly that. Do i smell a dam rat in the house ?
I hope not....
Seriously why do all these standards need to be set? Exped...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add OAK (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
7.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.916M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4912 | 7.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4¢ | 33823 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.06am 03/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| OAK (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable