Discussion Points, page-10

And last one - one for the man - Alf Gillman.

The South Africans were very adamant when abandoning their pebble reactor program in 2010. They essentially said 'pebble is not the way to go if SA goes nuclear'. But the SA PBMR is still in care and maintenance and the SA scientists are still clutching onto all their IP and unwilling to let it go. Does Gilly appreciate that the Chinese achieved what the South Africans could not - small modular reactors. With this success, does Gilly consider it possible that South Africa could reverse its stance on the pebble program given China's success.

Does he acknowledge that nuclear's high heat applications are now increasing in prominence given the proven advantages over water reactors in areas such as desalination, oil refining, bio fuel production and even nitrogen for agricultural processes.

Too much maybe Pauldola - maybe just ask Gilly the following "what type of natural flake graphite in terms of flake size and impurity content makes good nuclear graphite in your opinion."

If he knows which flake and what impurities are acceptable to the nuclear industry off the top of his head... could mean sumthin' - that's all I'm saying.

Good luck tonight (today) to all the Wolves. Looking forward to an update in the near future.