Divan TV, page-181

"... analysis of this stock".

Well that's one way of describing it - I suppose.

However, its my view that there are not too many examples of that person's posts that could be fairly and reasonably described as 'analysis'.

Cliched one liners cannot possibly be characterised as analysis.

Calling a speck stock to fail - gee - what are the odds?

If the analytical skills of a poster are credible then I think those skills would be better employed calling the winners and letting others know about it - haven't seen that happen too often.