mate, not every criticism is downramping. the reason you...

mate, not every criticism is downramping. the reason you generally get non-holders criticizing, it is to challenge the stock and hopefully get some answers/opinions that change your mind. I mean, if you aren't using these forums to get insights in the stock you want to buy or currently hold, then what is the point?

I am so sick of being called a downramper for challenging stocks; without these challenges, we are basically just looking at unchallenged sales fluff that isn't subject to regulation.

I may be wrong but i interpreted it as a challenge of this claim, I personally haven't seen this claim anywhere in my research so far and I am very keen to find where this comes from, it should be all over here including holding it's own thread with progress being discussed.

This one claim (and a little bit of a plan for it) would be enough for me to take a much larger position and even participate in cap raises to help it get there, it would also be a no brainer for right-minded SMSF players and dividend chasing investors. Seems odd to me this isn't plastered everywhere. Their website doesn't even have a vision statement?

Little bump for @cosmo71 would love to get to the source of this claim =)