There is a huge difference between ejecting someone because they are a criminal.
In Djokovic case he was removed by a minister by using discretionary powers based on personal opinion to remove him based on Djokovic beliefs.Two parts discretionary powers and personal opinion. I have a problem with personal opinion being exercised
The powers exercised were different, the standard of proof was different, the evidence was different. If you are going to be critical compare apples with apples.
In Australia you can also be removed if you are misogynistic. Julien Blanc was removed. Julien had nasty ideas but had committed no crime.
When you open the door for personal opinion and discretionary powers where does it start and end.
Note. I originally thought Djokovic vise was cancelled because he had made a false declaration on his visa which would have been reasonable. When i heard the governments reasoning I was socked.
