Comparing Catabasis P2 to ANP’s P2 is like comparing a hyundai to a Ferrari.
Their data showed the disease progression slowed marginally but our was multiple times better.. examing doctors said the Catabasis’s MRI data “was not quite statistically significant “
Also, attached is from PPMD comparing Natural History to Placebo.
https://www.parentprojectmd.org/ctap-study-shows-real-world-natural-history-data-comparable-to-placebo-data-from-trials-in-duchenne/
Anyone who thinks the data is comparable on any level needs to get themselves to a doctor
Comparing Catabasis P2 to ANP’s P2 is like comparing a hyundai...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PER (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
10.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $90.15M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 10.5¢ | 10.5¢ | 10.0¢ | $47.27K | 463.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 319942 | 10.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 10.5¢ | 86442 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PER (ASX) Chart |